Web Survey Bibliography
There are many different sample sources used today in market and opinion research. Based on number of studies being fielded and dollar volume, two of the most common sample sources in web-based research are river samples and non-probability panels. A non-probability panel recruits respondents in a number of different ways to collect together a group of people who will complete a number of surveys over time. While studies employing non-probability panels have an extensive history of use going back to the 1950s, river samples became more prominent in the past 10 years for web-based studies. A river sample recruits respondents on an ad hoc basis using online pop-up ads and other online recruitment techniques. Once river respondents respond to an invitation they are typically directed to an initial survey that screens them with demographic questions and other topic-relevant questions and then passes them over to ongoing surveys based on quota needs of a number of simultaneous live surveys. This study focused on whether experimental effects are similar in both direction and size in both types of samples. Respondents were randomly assigned to either a yes-no grid, a multiple response format (‘select all’), or a household combination grid to determine the purchase of a series of 16 products. We found similar effects for both sample sources in experimental effects – the combination grid had the highest incidence; the multiple response format was associated with lowest incidence. Though relative order of the results were similar, the river sample showed generally higher incidence for all product types across experimental conditions, however, the differences became smaller after controlling for demographic differences and self-rated consumer style (a series of measures to determine consumer orientation). We examine and propose additional analyses that could lead to reductions in differences in sample source outcomes.
Conference Homepage (abstract)
Web survey bibliography (4086)
- Presidential Elections in Iceland 2012 – Did online panel surveys give false hope to new candidates...; 2012; Jonsdottir, G. A., Dofradottir, A. G., Bjornsdottir, A. E.
- Website exit surveys. What can we measure with them?; 2012; Andreadis, I.
- Challenges and pitfalls of measuring wages via web surveys - some explorations; 2012; Steinmetz, S., Bianchi, A., Tijdens, K., Biffignandi, S.
- Adaptation of Cognitive Interviews for Web; 2012; Mohorko, A., Hlebec, V.
- The Usage of a Cloud Service as an Effective Way of Sharing Cognitive and Usability Test Information; 2012; Rouhunkoski, J., Godenhjelm, P.
- Database Lookup in Web Surveys; 2012; Couper, M. P., Zhang, C., Conrad, F. G., Tourangeau, R.
- Firefly Online Surveys: A fully featured tool for Web surveys and forums; 2012; Deal, K.
- Analyzing Functionalities for Online Questionnaire System (OQS); 2012; Atown, H. Y.
- Internet Mobility Survey Sampling Biases in Measuring Frequency of Use of Transport Modes ; 2012; Diana, M.
- Why one should incorporate the design weights when adjusting for unit nonresponse using response homogeneity...; 2012; Kott, P. S.
- A beginner's guide to DIY research ; 2012; Cates, T.
- Qualitatively Speaking: Mobile qualitative finally hits its stride; 2012; Bryson, J.
- Comfortable in the new medium: How online qual can benefit from our share-happy culture ; 2012; Rubenstein, P.
- A Smarter Way to Select Respondents for Surveys; 2012; Terhanian, G., Bremer, J.
- Modular Survey Design for Mobile Devices; 2012; Johnson, A., Kelly, F.
- Innovation in online data collection for scientific research: the Dutch MESS project; 2012; Das, M.
- Assessing the Magnitude of Non-Consent Biases in Linked Survey and Administrative Data; 2012; Sakshaug, J. W., Kreuter, F.
- Understanding the resilience of mail-back survey methods: An analysis of 20 years of change in response...; 2012; Rookey, B. D., Le, L., Littlejohn, M., Dillman, D. A.
- Using Collaborative Web Technology to Construct the Health Information National Trends Survey; 2012; Moser, R. P., Beckjord, E. B., Finney Rutten, L. J., Blake, K., Hesse, B. W.
- A Direct Comparison of Mobile Versus Online Survey Modes; 2012; Wells, T., Bailey, J., Link, M. W.
- The Reliability and Validity of Alternative Customer Satisfaction Measurement Scales in PC Web and Mobile...; 2012; Chrzan, K., Saunders, T.
- Nonresponse and Mode Effects in a Two-wave Randomized Mode Experiment; 2012; Beach, S., Musa, D.
- Question Order Effect: A Web Survey Experiment with Paradata; 2012; Ye, C., Tourangeau, R.
- Professional Respondents in Internet Panels: Who are They and What Do They Do to Our Data?; 2012; de Leeuw, E. D., Matthijsse, S.
- Using Text-to-Speech (TTS) for Audio-CASI; 2012; Couper, M. P., Kirgis, N., Buageila, S., Berglund, P.
- Using SMS Text Messaging To Collect Time Use Data; 2012; Brenner, P., DeLamater, J.
- A Shot in the Dark: Measurement Influence on Likelihood to Vaccination; 2012; Higgins, W. B., Thomas, R. K.
- Response Anchoring and Polarity Effects on Endorsement and Response Patterns; 2012; Higgins, W. B., Thomas, R. K.
- Update Your Status Lately? – Then Why Not Respond to Our Survey!; 2012; Borie-Holtz, D.
- Effects of Technical Difficulties on Item Nonresponse and Response Favorability in a Mixed-Mode Survey...; 2012; Gibson, J. L.
- Using Mixed-Mode Contacts to Facilitate Participation in Public Agency Client Surveys; 2012; Israel, G. D.
- Demonstration of the International Cross-Time, Cross-System Database; 2012; Miller, D.
- Telephone Status, Attitudes toward Participation in Future Surveys, and Willingness to Join a Local...; 2012; Beach, S., Musa, D.
- Where is Neutral? Using Negativity Biases to Interpret Thermometer Scores; 2012; Soroka, S., Albaugh, Q.
- I Got a Feeling: Comparison of Feeling Thermometers with Verbally Labeled Scales in Attitude Measurement...; 2012; Thomas, R. K., Bremer, J.
- Small sample surveys: Increasing rigor in supply chain management research; 2012; de Beuckelaer, A., Wagner, M. W.
- Question or Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode surveys: A Cross-cultural study in the Netherlands, Germany,...; 2012; de Leeuw, E. D., Nicolaas, G., Campanelli, P., Hox, J.
- The Confirmit Annual Market Research Software Survey 2011; 2012; Macer, T., Wilson, S.
- Using Online Panels for National Surveys of Low Incidence Populations: Findings from the CDC Influenza...; 2012; Boyle, J., Ball, S., Ding, H., Srinath, K. P., Euler, G.
- Using Probability-based On-line Samples to Calibrate Non-probability Opt-in Samples; 2012; DiSogra, C., Cobb, C. L., Chan, E., Dennis, J. M.
- Understanding Smartphone Usage to Take Web Surveys: A Cross Country Analysis; 2012; Stapleton, C.
- Scale Orientation, Number of Scale Points and Grids in Mobile Web Surveys; 2012; Chrzan, K., Saunders, T., Jue, A.
- Use of a 2nd Reminder Mailing, Quick Response Code and Optimized Mobile Survey to Increase Response...; 2012; Cantave, M. A., Gentry, R. J.
- The Effect on Differential Mailing Methodologies on Response Rates: Testing Advanced Notices, Package...; 2012; Pens, Y., Gentry, R. J.
- The River Flows: Comparison of Experimental Effect Replicability with Different Sample Sources; 2012; Thomas, R. K.
- Intensifying the Request: Results from an Experiment on Improving Internet Response Rates for Address...; 2012; Messer, B. L., Dillman, D. A.
- The Persistence of Attentiveness in Web Surveys: A Panel Study; 2012; Berinsky, A., Luks, S., Rivers, D.
- Designing Interactive Interventions in Web Surveys: Humanness, Social Presence and Data Quality; 2012; Zhang, Che.
- The Effect of Mode on Participant Responses to Qualitative Research in Virtual Worlds; 2012; Dipko, S., Billington, C., Brick, P. D.
- The Direction of Rating Scales and Its Influence on Response Behavior in Web Surveys; 2012; Keusch, F.